In my articles for Building
magazine, I refer to cases concerning adjudication as case
number X in my series. Some have asked for further details or
a copy of that list, so here it is.
On Friday 1st May 1998, the Commercial Construction
Industry took a great step forward. Jobs, quality of work, safety,
and timely performance will now benefit from what is known
colloquially as the Construction Act. Construction contracts, save
for a few notable exceptions, will provide a statutory right to a
28 day dispute decision making process called Adjudication.
The right arises in "The
Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996".
It applies under that name in England Wales and Scotland; in
Northern Ireland it applies since 1st June 1999.
This new Adjudication process is quite unlike anything that has
held the ring between disputing parties in commerce. Existing
Arbitration, Expert Determination, Conciliation, Mediation all
require a consensual approach; both parties must agree to take
their dispute to any one of those dispute processes. Not so New
Adjudication. Parliament now provides that each Construction
Contract shall provide that any party may call for this new
referee. If there is a dispute between Developer and Main
Contractor either party is entitled to forthwith call for this new
person. The Adjudicators burden is to decide on the rights of the
parties under the building contract and do so within the strict 28
day time frame. The "Decision" is binding forthwith. It
can only be overturned, revised or confirmed in Arbitration (if
the contract contains an Arbitration clause) or in litigation. It
has "temporary finality" and is an announcement by an
independent referee as to the rights of the contracting parties.
As for the procedure . . . how to adjudicate, it will often be
that the machinery is laid down in the adopted Adjudication Rules
or Standard Form Contract. By procedure we mean giving each party
a reasonable opportunity of putting his case and dealing with that
of his opponent. The watchword is fairness. Important too is not
to lose sight of the adjudicator’s fundamental task: it is to
decide the case put by the parties. No adjudicator can “make a
case” for either party. No adjudicator is there to “find” the
evidence, nor there to undermine a party’s case, nor there to dig
for rights or duties. If an adjudicator investigates at all, it
will be to clarify points of fact or law in the party’s case. It
is vital that each party prepares his position on facts, evidence,
rights and duties before he comes to adjudication. Important too
that he has put his case already to the ‘other-side’. Remember,
the adjudicator will have little time to do much more than decide
upon the written case, as put. It is a contest between ‘A’ and ‘B’
not an investigation by the adjudicator.
Why Adjudication? British Construction offers its customers
great flexibility. Many a construction project is designed and
built on the hoof. Changes are inevitable ... and welcome. But
change means change in price ... and programme. Disputes are
ordinary. If the dispute is not efficiently managed it reduces
itself and the project to conflict. Quality, time, safety suffers.
And, occasionally it is true that some folk took advantage; the
withholding of money was too easy. The New Adjudicator will
quickly identify half baked claims; the building project will not
be stymied by wrong headed nonsense.
The Construction Contr